Language and Culture
Fieldworkers look to both verbal and nonverbal language to understand rules and meanings at their fieldsite
Why study verbal language?
Why study verbal language?
- verbal language brings nonverbal thoughts and ideas to the surface
- language can become the focal point of your research
- informants "voices" are most clearly transmitted through their verbal communication
What do systems of communication reveal?
- solidarity and exclusion markers
- aspects unique to culture (jargon)
- symbolic systems within a culture
- the relationship between language and culture
Nonverbal Communication: Body Language and Culture
- proxemics-use of and meaning of space
- kinesics-meaning of body movement and gesture
- microsignals-gaze (etc.) -unconsciouss small signals
- touch-meaning and use
- dress and adornments-meaning of chosen displayed symbols of identity
- tatoos
- dress
- hair
- piercings
- teeth
- makeup
- plastic surgery or other bodily "mutilations"
- look for key words, phrases and ideas that serve as clues into informant's culture
- think of every "artifact" of a culture like a" sponge" and ask what you can squeeze out of a concept.
- remember that language changes over time and even within a specific context
- where we find cultural differences, we will find language differences
- example: meditation on the word "cheek" (19th century)
- creating a "glossary" of terms or words with specific meanings
- integrating the language of the subculture into your account in your descriptions
- using significant terms to theme your ethnographic research and analysis
- words as cultural artifacts
- emphasis on terms means the "thing" they are describing is important in culture and demands further investigation
- different words for "silk" in China, or "snow" in the Arctic
- context in which words are used (rules for performance)
- example: the word "whore"
During the 2018 Miss’d America Pageant dress
rehearsal, as each contestant was introduced and came to the microphone out of
drag to say something about themselves, HRH Mortimer yelled from the seats, “Whore!!!”
When asked later about the purpose of this “reading,” HRH Mortimer explained:
“I say “whore” because I want to throw them off
their game…like someone in the audience is like, “Ohhh…you whore!” And they
find out later it’s me, saying, “I see you.” I make sure to say it with every
one that came out. To me “whore” is not an insult, it’s a compliment. It’s like
recognizing you exist…hey, I see you up there on that runway…I’m here with you.
It’s real.”
- example the word "read"
Language
ideologies in gay and drag communication and ways of speaking are important
products and practices developed and shared in the drag community in Atlantic
City. Local queens learned how to
perform drag together as they all worked the same vibrant bar scene; to make
costumes, put on productions, and paint their faces. They
developed a particular way of communicating with each other, sharing a
vocabulary and style of communication, a camp style of speaking that signaled
their identity as local drag queens. Communication was based on competition,
and humor was based on a kind of reading of those performances. Reading can be
described as a sometimes-scathing critique of someone’s appearance, lack of
talent, intelligence, hygiene, or most of all, sexual behavior. Reading is one
of the many aspects of communicative interaction that indexes gayness, and as
Rusty Barrett beautifully illustrates in his research, “gay male subcultures
are crucially constituted through language.” Reading is a communicative strategy that is learned as part of the evolution of
one’s identity as a gay man. Miss’d America 2015, Fifi Dubois, talks about how
she sees “drag language”:
“It’s
fun…its campy…Its gay culture. I think it gives us our own dialect, our own
language that people can use. It’s a way to identify other gay people. Or other
drag queens…through how we talk.”
Gay Language (e.g. sentimental voice, emphatic
stress, diminutive affix, marked vocabulary), and stylistic forms like reading and camp in general, serve to index gay identity and gay culture. Indexicality
is critical to understanding forms of camp, (discussed further in the section
below), and is “central to monitoring questions of sexual identity such as
“gaydar.” Much
of gay language establishes identity through forms of indexical
disjuncture. Indexical disjuncture
uses indexical signs (aspects of communication) that are marked. That is, they
are counter to normative expectations of the relationship between form and
context. Drag queening is an obvious form of disjuncture, and so are the mocking and
insulting characteristics of reading, since their intention is to be properly
read as neither mocking nor insulting. This is one reason why drag queens often
find it curious that feminists critique their presentations as misogynistic.
The disjuncture, although referencing normativity, has little to do in their
minds with its uncritical acceptance. As Josh Rivers noted “drag queens all
over the world are engaged in the quotidian negotiation of boundaries between
what Michael Lambek terms the “continuous person,” their “boy selves,” and the “discontinuous
act of performing” their drag personas.” Reading is a recognition of this negotiation, which is how drag identity is
properly werked. It is a recognition of the fluid (rather than distinct) boundaries between
their boy and drag selves. As Evelyn Syde described:
“…[I]t’s
not just insulting someone. A good read is well thought out, educated, creative
and clever, but in person… well, reading does come from the AIDS crisis and the
terror that everyone was going through, and it was a way for people to find
humor in a desperate situation, so… reading and shade are friendly reminders to
not take this so seriously, ourselves. At the end of the day we are men in
dresses. This is not necessarily a living; we are doing it out of love for the
most part. [It] is a reminder to humble yourself, and to remember that at the
end of the day you are going to go home to your cats.”
The sentiment that
reading acts as recognition of fallibility is meant to remind queens not to
take themselves too seriously, but it is not meant to be hurtful. One reads
themselves and people they care about.
- example of the word "camp"
Although
camp is not exclusive to gay communication and presentation, interpretations of
camp are, according to Barrett, deeply dependent on the normative citations within LGBT communities,
comprising a folk wisdom in gay male culture. From this perspective, gay men
learn a set of “essential aesthetic judgments for the evaluation of camp” that play an important
role in the “social construction of (gay male) identity.” Drag, unlike transvestism, is premised on theatrical
structure and style. “There is no drag without an actor and his audience, and
there is no drag without drama (or theatricality).” Men who become drag queens have come out in and been socialized in
the homosexual community first. He is already a gay man and must come out again
as a drag queen. The drag queen, like camp, flaunts her homosexuality on
stage, without any apology. As Newton notes in her classic study of drag queens
in New York City, drag is inherently expressive of gayness:
“…drag
symbolizes gayness. The drag queen symbolizes an open declaration, even
celebration, of homosexual. The drag queen says for his gay audience, who
cannot say it, “I’m gay, I don’t care who knows it, the straight world be
damned.”
As Morgan Wells, Miss’d America 1999 and owner of
Morgan Wells’ Drag Closet explains:
“Yaaaas
it’s campy! And girl you know it should be. You got to have something to laugh
about. And why not? When your friends are all sick and dying and then people
are saying it’s your fault. When what you supposed to act like is really the
drag. The world is already ironic, funny, ridiculous. It’s just that some of us
can see it, you know…and some of us can’t. You ain’t a drag queen, NO, you
probably ain’t GAY unless you can!”
The ability to see the ironic, funny, and ridiculous
nature of the world at any moment is illustrative of this folk wisdom and gay
ideological perspective that also includes assumptions about gay male
superiority in areas of taste and style. Shared as well, are values about
self-presentation, like the necessity for passing in certain
contexts, and the ironic, sometimes parodical nature of these quotidian public
presentations of self. Gay men must become versed
in this folk wisdom and the language ideologies underlying gay camp
communicative interaction in order to be successful in gay culture, since
fluency in these gains access to gay subculture and protection from the often
hostile heterosexual world.
- Ethnopoetic notation: allows you to preserve the diction, pacing and emphasis of language
- rhythms
- repetitions,
- tensions
- insights
- cultural meanings
- Insider Language: How to Do the Research
- goal is to analyze language from the perspective of your informants
- occupational language
- cursing
- other special genres of talk (like reading, above).
- jokes,joking behavior
- proverbial speech
- spiritual/other performance
- urban legends
- contain within them important cultural values, beliefs and ideals
- lack of talk
SUMMARY: Language and Culture are Intimately Linked
Comments
Post a Comment